UV Ink Curing Units: Curing units for UV inks range greatly in price. While UV inks cure with
even the simplest system, the following are important in
selecting UV processing equipment: the type, width, number of
units, cooling method, and temperature of operation.
Conveyorised or modular: Conveyorised units can be placed
behind existing equipment with little effort. They usually have
interlocks that shut lamps down when cooling system, power or
conveyor mechanical failures occur. These complete,
self-contained units are usually more expensive, but offer
features like vacuum hold-down, conveyor speed indicator and
trouble lights.
In many cases, a modular lamp may be all that is needed. Modular
lamp and power packs are readily available for adding to
existing presses or conveyors. Although less expensive, they
require adaptation to existing equipment. In general, modular
systems have fewer interlocks and more limited cooling systems
than their conveyorised counterparts.
Width: Width selection is based on belt speed and
substrate size. In general, wider width units require greater
capital investment.
Number of units: While good price discounts exist for
buying in multiples, it is possible that one or two UV ink curing
units could entirely replace dozens of racks, or four to five
conventional hot air dryers. A high-speed cylinder press and one
small curing unit may replace five or six flat bed screen
presses and accompanying drying systems. Starting with one unit
may be better than buying too many units.
Type of lamps and reflectors: Although there are a wide
variety of lamps and reflectors available, medium pressure
mercury vapor, focused-type reflectors are extremely efficient
and allow for high belt speeds at energy levels sufficient to
cure most inks on the market.
Cooling: The cooling system is an integral part of a
unit's operation. UV lamp suppliers can offer assistance in
selecting an appropriate unit, based on printing applications
and substrates.
Number of lamps: Curing units are available with 1, 2, 3,
4 or more lamps. The number of lamps required will depend on the
substrate, coating and desired line speed. UV inks cure well in
many of the one or two-lamp systems at speeds approaching 400
ft/min. A two-lamp curing unit with high/low settings on each
lamp is highly versatile, lengthens lamp life and conserves
energy.
Finally, substrates, coating, and printing speeds will determine
the appropriate curing unit. A printer should start by matching
the first processor unit to the printing segment that would be
easiest to convert to energy curing, and learn how to print the
inks well before converting the whole plant.
Electron Beam Curing Units: The advantages of EB curing include complete through-curing and
no residual monomers. For some specialty applications, these
advantages more than offset what are sometimes seen as
disadvantages of EB equipment. First, EB units are large, so
they require more space than UV units. Second, they can be more
costly to install and operate because of special safety
requirements. (These costs however, are receding as technical
refinements are made.)
Whenever an electron beam strikes a surface, x-rays can be
generated, which can present a health hazard within an
unprotected range of several meters. Lead shielding and a
radiation detection system are therefore essential.
There are two main configurations for EB generators: the scanned
beam type and the linear cathode type. In both cases, electrons
are generated by a hot metal cathode within a high vacuum.
In the scanned beam unit, electrons are accelerated through a
positively charged grid, then focused into a beam by a magnetic
lens. A magnetic field then deflects the beam, scanning it
across the width of the emission window.
In the linear cathode unit, a filament cathode of press width is
suspended in a vacuum tube. Again, electrons are accelerated
towards a positive grid, but in this case an unfocused beam of
electrons passes through the emission window to the printed
film.
While the linear cathode unit is less powerful than the scanned
beam type, it is smaller in size and easier to shield, so it is
generally preferred for printing applications.